Wind farm opponents’ complaint lacked proof: judge

A group of landowners in Simcoe County, Ontario, was unsuccessful in using the courts to prevent the construction of a wind farm in their area. The group sued the company that would construct the project, wpd Canada Corporation, as well as the farmers who own the land on which the project is proposed to be built.

The Fairview Wind Project is described as an industrial wind farm with a capacity to generate 18.4 MW of electricity. The landowners wanted the court to grant an injunction to prevent construction, and to award “compensatory damages” of $16.6 million for loss of property value, negligence, nuisance and other complaints. The case was dismissed without a trial, the judge ruling that the plaintiffs were unable to prove that they had a cause of action.

The contract for the project was awarded under the Ontario Power Authority’s Feed-in Tariff program (FIT) in May, 2010. The landowners claimed that as soon as Fairview Wind Farm issued public notice of the project, as required by law, the value of their property fell and they were put at risk of negative health effects from the proposed wind turbines.

However, the court ruled that these claims were entirely speculative, especially given that the project had not yet begun construction. Since the plaintiffs in the case couldn’t prove that their land had lost value, there could be no compensation. A legal blogger at Dale & Lessman LLP wrote that opponents of wind farms should be sure that they can prove their claims of damages due to wind farm developments in future if they intend to initiate a legal action. Otherwise they risk the same result as in the Fairview case. Legal costs, which are generally borne by the unsuccessful litigant, could be in the range of hundreds of thousands of dollars.

According to the legal blog, the court in this case left open the possibility for the plaintiffs to sue the wind developer again, if there is concrete evidence to support their claims. For that, there must be a “high degree of probability” that the alleged harms will in fact occur.

Did you miss this?

Other Popular Stories

  • Industrial chemicals producers report second-most profitable year
  • Auto sales surging in North America, plunging in Russia
  • New catalyst could help bring hydrogen fuel economy closer
  • Toronto an ideal location for Amazon HQ 2: If Amazon needs to hire tech employees, GTA and Canada has the edge
  • Canada's economy grew in Q4, manufacturing up in December
  • Higher efficiency solar cells within reach
  • Blowing up the Moon for Water? Space Miners Aim to "Mine Water" as Early as 2023
  • Plastics use in cars to nearly double in four years: report
  • French aerospace companies to set up shop in Montreal
  • Engineers Canada calls for more women to enter profession
  • IKEA buys Alberta wind farm
  • Automation, robotics to have profound effect on industry in coming years
  • Canada keeping up pressure on US for Keystone XL approval
  • Shipyard receives $65.4 million under national shipbuilding strategy
  • Interstellar Mission to Commemorate 100th Anniversary of Moon Landing
  • Manufacturing sales up in December but down for the year on weak energy sector
  • Manufacturing sector saw slight improvement in August: RBC
  • Global Warming Cap Could Save Economy Trillions
  • Siemens gives Western U engineering huge PLM software grant
  • Small business tax rate cut to 3.5 percent will only partially mitigate impact of minimum wage increases, both set for January 1 in Ontario
Scroll to Top