Wind farm opponents’ complaint lacked proof: judge

A group of landowners in Simcoe County, Ontario, was unsuccessful in using the courts to prevent the construction of a wind farm in their area. The group sued the company that would construct the project, wpd Canada Corporation, as well as the farmers who own the land on which the project is proposed to be built.

The Fairview Wind Project is described as an industrial wind farm with a capacity to generate 18.4 MW of electricity. The landowners wanted the court to grant an injunction to prevent construction, and to award “compensatory damages” of $16.6 million for loss of property value, negligence, nuisance and other complaints. The case was dismissed without a trial, the judge ruling that the plaintiffs were unable to prove that they had a cause of action.

The contract for the project was awarded under the Ontario Power Authority’s Feed-in Tariff program (FIT) in May, 2010. The landowners claimed that as soon as Fairview Wind Farm issued public notice of the project, as required by law, the value of their property fell and they were put at risk of negative health effects from the proposed wind turbines.

However, the court ruled that these claims were entirely speculative, especially given that the project had not yet begun construction. Since the plaintiffs in the case couldn’t prove that their land had lost value, there could be no compensation. A legal blogger at Dale & Lessman LLP wrote that opponents of wind farms should be sure that they can prove their claims of damages due to wind farm developments in future if they intend to initiate a legal action. Otherwise they risk the same result as in the Fairview case. Legal costs, which are generally borne by the unsuccessful litigant, could be in the range of hundreds of thousands of dollars.

According to the legal blog, the court in this case left open the possibility for the plaintiffs to sue the wind developer again, if there is concrete evidence to support their claims. For that, there must be a “high degree of probability” that the alleged harms will in fact occur.

Did you miss this?

Other Popular Stories

  • SpaceX Mars Exploration By 2019? Maybe not.
  • Giant wind-solar development announces SMA Canada for O&M
  • Scientists Work to Grow, Create, Imitate Organs and Tissue
  • First Energy Island to Provide Electricity for 3 Million Households
  • The New ispace Lunar Lander — Commercial space travel to the far side of the moon
  • Nanotechnology can help clean up oil spills with super-absorbant carbon nanotube sponges
  • Bombardier to build MRO facility in China
  • Tiangong-1 Update
  • Wind capacity reaches 82,183 megawatts in US, enough to power 24 million homes
  • Aerospace volatility evident in manufacturing output for December
  • Boeing expands Winnipeg plant; Dreamliners set to fly again
  • Cascade Aerospace named a Hercules heavy maintenance centre
  • CAE to acquire Lockheed Martin flight training division
  • Bombardier holds update on CSeries aircraft
  • Innovative Tech: Converting old mines to "gravity batteries" — sand into energy
  • Ontario to lose Toyota Corolla production but gain . . . ?
  • Aerospace companies announce satellite, service contracts
  • Modular WORMS Prototype: Revolutionizing Lunar Exploration with LEGO-like Robotics
  • Bill Gates betting we can invent our way to a clean energy world
  • TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline clears last hurdle in $10 billion project as Nebraska approves 3 to 2
Scroll to Top