Keystone XL clears another hurdle but fight not over

The US State Department reported that it has no major environmental objections to TransCanada Corp’s Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry crude oil from Alberta more than 1,600 kilometres into America’s heartland. Though it does not recommend that the line be built, the State Department report, the Final Environmental Impact Statement, is seen by the pro-pipeline side as a big victory. Opponents, however, plan to step up their protests.

The report notes that the Canadian tar sands will be developed whether the US is on side with the pipeline or not. Other options for shipping the oil, including rail, trucks and barges, would be even worse for the environment, the report notes.

oil-pipeline-KeystoneXL-TransCanada-Barack-Obama-John-Kerry-Republicans-Boehner-Congress-EDIWeekly

Canada’s minister of natural resources, Joe Oliver, is urging President Obama to finally make his decision, though strictly speaking, it is not the president’s decision to make at this time. The pipeline has been under review for five years now. Five environmental impact studies have been done, Oliver noted, and each one has concluded that the pipeline would not adversely affect the environment. The concern among environmental groups on both sides of the border is that a spill from the pipeline could be devastating to the environment.

The Republicans in the US Congress are strongly in favour of Keystone. House Speaker John Boehner said today that the president must now “stand with the overwhelming majority of American people and approve this critical project.”

The head of the influential American Petroleum Institute, Jack Gerard, who has long championed the pipeline, said that the latest government review “puts to rest any credible concerns about the pipeline’s potential negative impact on the environment.” He called for the project to be “swiftly approved.”

It is not likely that approval will be swift, however. The State Department, headed by Senator John Kerry, must now consider input from a number of other government agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency and both the Defence and Energy Departments. They will address issues of national security, as well as economic and environmental impacts. The public will also have a 30-day period in which to comment, beginning on February 5.

The president has said that he not approve Keystone unless it can be shown that it does not “significantly exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution.” While today’s announcement appears to satisfy that condition, the “problem of carbon pollution” is a very broad area. Some have argued that building the pipeline will only serve to perpetuate America’s dependence of “dirty oil,” which in itself could be interpreted as contributing to that problem.

Did you miss this?

Other Popular Stories

  • TESS SpaceX Launch
  • 99.99% of Salt Removed from Sea Water with Innovative Nano-Filter — Important with Changing Global Weather
  • Test of SpaceX crew escape system goes off perfectly
  • Artificial pancreas would reduce need for self-care by diabetics, improve insulin delivery
  • Green Hydrogen is becoming more mainstream
  • Energy costs, global temperature, continue rising
  • Scientists claim 30 per cent improvement in solar cell efficiency
  • Molson Coors reports on environmental stewardship goals
  • 100,000 watt laser firing 10,000 pulses per second would "deorbit" tons of dangerous space debris
  • Windsor's good fortune with Chrysler hiring tempered by TPP concerns
  • Aerospace industry poised for growth: report
  • Space engineering firm COM DEV announces major satellite contract
  • Widespread gains in June manufacturing sales encouraging sign in sluggish economy
  • Engineers Working to Develop Artificial Gravity for Near-Earth Orbit Space Station
  • SpaceX-1 Launches Falcon 9
  • GE Aviation opens new robotics facility in Quebec
  • Thunder Bay wind farm gets government approval
  • Building permits up in June, non-residential construction leading
  • Aerospace companies announce satellite, service contracts
  • Wood-based battery the next energy storage solution?
Scroll to Top