SPACE 1971 vs today: looking back on the anniversary of Apollo 14’s landing on the moon; with new landings planned, how much have we advanced?

Today is the aniversary of Apollo 14’s landing on the moon — 47 years ago! Elon Musk’s vision — to take mankind back to “manned landings” — seems more credible when we look back decades at man’s early landings on the moon. We are also about 24 hours away from the launch of Falcon Heavy — SpaceX’s rough rival to the powerful old Saturn V, which helped the US dominate the Space Race. [See embed video feed below — in 24 hours watch the Falcon Heavy liftoff (we hope.)]

 

Engineered Design Insider Saturn V versus today rockets Flacon HeavyOil Gas Automotive Aerospace Industry Magazine
Comparison of Saturn V (far left) from 50 years ago, and today’s rockets, including the Falcon Heavy (beside Saturn V), which launches tomorrow.

 

Ambitions of NASA to return to the moon, then on to Mars, certainly seem technically possible when you consider it’s been nearly 50 years since the first manned landing. Without sophisticated computer programs and today’s propulsion technologies, NASA managed the incredible — planting the flag on another planetary body. [See video below with landing.]

 

Engineered Design Insider Lunar landing module Apollo 14Oil Gas Automotive Aerospace Industry Magazine
Apollo 14 Lunar landing module after touch down on the moon.

 

It’s fascinating to look back — remembering that “faulty switch” that sent “aborts” to the landing modules primitive computer in the landing module Antares. NASA was forced to reprogram the computer to facilitate the landing. Even more hair-raising, landing radar was not able to measure the modules altitude and speed. Thanks to a manual landing by astronaut Alan Shepard, the lunar module landed right on target.

At 14:58 UTC, they stepped on to the moon’s surface. Shepard’s first words as he stepped on the lunar surface were:

“And it’s been a long way, but we’re here.”

 

Comparing Saturn V to Space X’s new monster Falcon Heavy

How much difference did 50 years make in technology? If size matters, then the Apollo mission, launched on a Saturn V rocket might seem to dominate — it was bigger than even Space X’s amazing new Falcon Heavy. At a cost to launch of, according to Universe today, the Saturn V “Adjusted for inflation, this works out to approximately $1.23 billion per launch, of which $710 million went towards production.” Estimates for NASA’s new large rocket project also come in around $1 billion per launch.

 

Animation of Space X Heavy launch
Artist’s concept (animation) of Space X heavy launch, currently scheduled for tomorrow Feb 6 launch.

 

This works out to about $4000 per pound. [1] Although the payload, weight and size of Falcon Heavy is lower, as of April 2016, “SpaceX has indicated that a Falcon Heavy could lift 2268 kg (8000 lbs) to GTO for a cost of $90 million a launch – which works out to $3968.25 per kg ($1125 per pound).” Components are re-usable.

Saturn V was sufficient for the moon. Is Falcon Heavy ready for Mars? With modern technology, Elon Musk believes so.

Engineered Design Insider Lunar Apollo 14 Launch NASAOil Gas Automotive Aerospace Industry Magazine
Launch of Saturn V rocket for the Apollo 14 mission in 1971.

Here’s a quick comparison of 50-year-old Saturn V versus tomorrow’s Falcon Heavy

Saturn V: Falcon Heavy:
Height: 110.6 m (363 ft) 70 m (230 ft)
Diameter: 10.1 m (33 ft) 12.2 m (40 ft)
Weight: 2,970,000 kg
(6,540,000 lbs)
1,420,788 kg
(3,132,301 lb)
Stages:  3  2+
Engines
(1st Stage):
5 Rocketdyne F-1 3 x 9 Merlin 1D
   2nd stage 5 Rocketdyne J-2 1 Merlin 1D
   3rd stage 1 Rocketdyne J-2
Thrust
(1st stage):
34,020 kN 22,918 kN (sea level);
24,681 kN (vacuum)
   2nd stage 4,400 kN 934 kN
   3rd stage 1,000 kN
Payload (LEO): 140,000 kg
(310,000 lbs)
54,400 kg
(119,900 lbs)
Payload (TLI):  48,600 kg
(107,100 lbs)
 16,000 kg
(35,000 lbs)

Engineered Design Insider Lunar mission Apollo 14 astronauts Shepard Roosa and MitchellOil Gas Automotive Aerospace Industry Magazine
Apollo 14 astronauts.

 

 

Full timeline of landing

Engineered Design Insider Lunar Apollo 14 splashdownOil Gas Automotive Aerospace Industry Magazine
“Old style” landing. Apollo 14 splashdown.

LM – CSM docking

  • Undocked: February 5, 1971 – 04:50:43 UTC
  • Docked: February 6, 1971 – 20:35:42 UTC
EVA 1
  • Start: February 5, 1971, 14:42:13 UTC
  • Shepard – EVA 1
  • Stepped onto Moon: 14:54 UTC
  • LM ingress: 19:22 UTC
  • Mitchell – EVA 1
  • Stepped onto Moon: 14:58 UTC
  • LM ingress: 19:18 UTC
  • End: February 5, 19:30:50 UTC
    • Duration: 4 hours, 47 minutes, 50 seconds
EVA 2
  • Start: February 6, 1971, 08:11:15 UTC
  • Shepard – EVA 2
  • Stepped onto Moon: 08:16 UTC
  • LM ingress: 12:38 UTC
  • Mitchell – EVA 2
  • Stepped onto Moon: 08:23 UTC
  • LM ingress: 12:28 UTC
  • End: February 6, 12:45:56 UTC
    • Duration: 4 hours, 34 minutes, 41 seconds


NOTES

[1] Universe Today>>

Did you miss this?

Other Popular Stories

  • Canada will reduce oil and gas industry emissions
  • Alphabet's Chairman praises Toronto technology as Google's Sidewalk Labs announces living "technology lab" for Toronto Portlands
  • Slower growth, need for new markets challenge Canada's oil producers
  • World will invest $7.8 trillion in solar, wind over next 25 years: Bloomberg
  • Bombardier holds update on CSeries aircraft
  • LED bulb manufacturer receives R&D funds from Ottawa
  • More warnings that Canada could miss the LNG boat
  • Could the Future of Energy be Entirely Renewable?
  • Cars new and used dominate Canada's exports
  • Bombardier flies new CSeries jet for first time
  • Airline debacle highlights need for businesses to be tech smart
  • Fewer building permits in February for non-residential construction
  • Some industry support for new water heater regulations
  • Graphene discovery could revolutionize fuel cell function
  • Global car sales will set record this year: Scotiabank
  • Financial services fastest growing industry in Canada for exports: Conference Board of Canada
  • Pratt & Whitney Canada to invest $1 billion in engine development
  • Manufacturing recovers ground in January: GDP up 0.2 per cent
  • Two auto parts plants adding jobs in southwestern Ontario
  • Aerospace industry fuelled by emerging markets: BMO
Scroll to Top