SPACE 1971 vs today: looking back on the anniversary of Apollo 14’s landing on the moon; with new landings planned, how much have we advanced?

Today is the aniversary of Apollo 14’s landing on the moon — 47 years ago! Elon Musk’s vision — to take mankind back to “manned landings” — seems more credible when we look back decades at man’s early landings on the moon. We are also about 24 hours away from the launch of Falcon Heavy — SpaceX’s rough rival to the powerful old Saturn V, which helped the US dominate the Space Race. [See embed video feed below — in 24 hours watch the Falcon Heavy liftoff (we hope.)]

 

Comparison of Saturn V (far left) from 50 years ago, and today’s rockets, including the Falcon Heavy (beside Saturn V), which launches tomorrow.

 

Ambitions of NASA to return to the moon, then on to Mars, certainly seem technically possible when you consider it’s been nearly 50 years since the first manned landing. Without sophisticated computer programs and today’s propulsion technologies, NASA managed the incredible — planting the flag on another planetary body. [See video below with landing.]

 

Apollo 14 Lunar landing module after touch down on the moon.

 

It’s fascinating to look back — remembering that “faulty switch” that sent “aborts” to the landing modules primitive computer in the landing module Antares. NASA was forced to reprogram the computer to facilitate the landing. Even more hair-raising, landing radar was not able to measure the modules altitude and speed. Thanks to a manual landing by astronaut Alan Shepard, the lunar module landed right on target.

At 14:58 UTC, they stepped on to the moon’s surface. Shepard’s first words as he stepped on the lunar surface were:

“And it’s been a long way, but we’re here.”

 

Comparing Saturn V to Space X’s new monster Falcon Heavy

How much difference did 50 years make in technology? If size matters, then the Apollo mission, launched on a Saturn V rocket might seem to dominate — it was bigger than even Space X’s amazing new Falcon Heavy. At a cost to launch of, according to Universe today, the Saturn V “Adjusted for inflation, this works out to approximately $1.23 billion per launch, of which $710 million went towards production.” Estimates for NASA’s new large rocket project also come in around $1 billion per launch.

 

Artist’s concept (animation) of Space X heavy launch, currently scheduled for tomorrow Feb 6 launch.

 

This works out to about $4000 per pound. [1] Although the payload, weight and size of Falcon Heavy is lower, as of April 2016, “SpaceX has indicated that a Falcon Heavy could lift 2268 kg (8000 lbs) to GTO for a cost of $90 million a launch – which works out to $3968.25 per kg ($1125 per pound).” Components are re-usable.

Saturn V was sufficient for the moon. Is Falcon Heavy ready for Mars? With modern technology, Elon Musk believes so.

Launch of Saturn V rocket for the Apollo 14 mission in 1971.

Here’s a quick comparison of 50-year-old Saturn V versus tomorrow’s Falcon Heavy

Saturn V:Falcon Heavy:
Height:110.6 m (363 ft)70 m (230 ft)
Diameter:10.1 m (33 ft)12.2 m (40 ft)
Weight:2,970,000 kg
(6,540,000 lbs)
1,420,788 kg
(3,132,301 lb)
Stages: 3 2+
Engines
(1st Stage):
5 Rocketdyne F-13 x 9 Merlin 1D
   2nd stage5 Rocketdyne J-21 Merlin 1D
   3rd stage1 Rocketdyne J-2
Thrust
(1st stage):
34,020 kN22,918 kN (sea level);
24,681 kN (vacuum)
   2nd stage4,400 kN934 kN
   3rd stage1,000 kN
Payload (LEO):140,000 kg
(310,000 lbs)
54,400 kg
(119,900 lbs)
Payload (TLI): 48,600 kg
(107,100 lbs)
 16,000 kg
(35,000 lbs)

Apollo 14 astronauts.

 

 

Full timeline of landing

“Old style” landing. Apollo 14 splashdown.

LM – CSM docking

  • Undocked: February 5, 1971 – 04:50:43 UTC
  • Docked: February 6, 1971 – 20:35:42 UTC
EVA 1
  • Start: February 5, 1971, 14:42:13 UTC
  • Shepard – EVA 1
  • Stepped onto Moon: 14:54 UTC
  • LM ingress: 19:22 UTC
  • Mitchell – EVA 1
  • Stepped onto Moon: 14:58 UTC
  • LM ingress: 19:18 UTC
  • End: February 5, 19:30:50 UTC
    • Duration: 4 hours, 47 minutes, 50 seconds
EVA 2
  • Start: February 6, 1971, 08:11:15 UTC
  • Shepard – EVA 2
  • Stepped onto Moon: 08:16 UTC
  • LM ingress: 12:38 UTC
  • Mitchell – EVA 2
  • Stepped onto Moon: 08:23 UTC
  • LM ingress: 12:28 UTC
  • End: February 6, 12:45:56 UTC
    • Duration: 4 hours, 34 minutes, 41 seconds


NOTES

[1] Universe Today>>

Did you miss this?

Other Popular Stories

  • Oil train disaster plays to the pro-pipeline position
  • Manufacturing closer to stabilizing in January: report
  • Bombardier promises to deal with Toronto's streetcars, while CSeries sales take off
  • 3D printing, or additive manufacturing, becoming more mainstream across many manufacturing sectors
  • First LNG-powered ferry to begin service in Quebec
  • Electric bush plane: combined project of Zenair and Solar Ship combines rugged short landings with green technology
  • Space X Falcon Heavy launch live! 'Great rocket launch or the best fireworks display,' says Elon Musk. Watch the launch at 3pm today live on EDI Weekly
  • Self-Driving Cars: Virtual Reality's role in "boredom on the road" for passengers of autonomous vehicles
  • NASA Tests 3D Printed Rocket Part
  • Agreement between western provinces smooths way for pipelines
  • BC, Ontario economies to lead country into 2017
  • Scientists Improve Behavior of Quantum Dots
  • Women wanted in construction trades as "tremendous opportunity" exists
  • Canada's exports soared in June while imports fell
  • Daimler Records Big Profits and 2018 Plans
  • The Future of Transportation
  • Time running out for dealing with global greenhouse emissions: report
  • Bombardier CSeries finally flies the skies of Paris
  • Keystone XL clears another hurdle but fight not over
  • SAFFir is an autonomous robot firefighter being tested by the Navy for dangerous situations. Unlike other firefighting robots, SAFFir is both autonomous, and stands on two legs, with two hands to grasp fire hoses.
    Robots save lives: robot fire-fighters take on explosive situations. SAFFiR shows how they can be ultimately be autonomous.
Scroll to Top