Canada-EU free trade deal in jeopardy over investor protection

The free trade deal that the Harper government has been negotiating with the European Union has been stalled, if not killed outright, by the refusal of the German government to sign it. All twenty-eight members of the EU must sign the agreement for it to take effect. The German objections to the deal as currently negotiated concern the legal protection extended to firms that invest in the EU. The “investor-state” clause allows investing companies to sue governments if they feel they are not being treated fairly by a given country’s legislation. The German government does not view this level of investor protection as necessary.

cheese-EU-Canada-free-trade-EDIweekly
EU cheese exports to Canada would more than double under the EU-Canada free trade agreement as negotiated. Germany has rejected the deal because of its investor-state clauses.

The EU is also in the midst of negotiating a free trade deal with the United States. It has been said that the Canada deal is a “test” for the US deal, and that if the Canada deal does not pass neither will the US deal. The US trade deal contains investor-state terms similar to the ones being rejected by the Germans. Under these terms, investors from Canada, and eventually from the United States, would be able to challenge policy makers and have their trade disputes resolved by independent arbitration panels, not in the courts. Trade disputes in North America are resolved  by investor state arbitration under NAFTA. The German position is that any such dispute should be resolved in the German courts.

If the multibillion-dollar free trade deal passed, virtually all duties on non-agricultural goods would be eliminated immediately, including forestry, chemical and plastic products. Most duties and tariffs would also be removed from fish and seafood and agricultural products. Canada’s beef and pork producers would be able to sell 50,000 and 81,000 tonnes respectively. European cheese makers would be able to more than double their exports to Canada. Canadian auto makers would also be able to export more cars to Europe.

Ontario has estimated that the deal would create about 30,000 jobs in the province. Various goods imported from Europe, at least in principle, would be cheaper for Canadian consumers, including foods, wines, spirits and cars. At present there are tariffs on European auto parts up to 4.5 per cent.

Did you miss this?

Other Popular Stories

  • $1 billion injection from Quebec government will keep Bombardier aloft
  • Ontario missing out on $billions from federal government: study
  • Manufacturers group says government policies reflect its input
  • New wind farm approved near Lake Huron shore
  • Will Ukraine be Canada's next big oil market?
  • Manufacturing sales off in November led by cars, chemicals
  • Aerospace industry poised for growth: report
  • Bombardier announces firm CSeries orders from Russia, Gulf Air
  • SpaceX’s Falcon 9 Ripped Hole in Ionosphere During 2017 Launch
  • Oil & Gas Report: Iran sanctions not priced into Brent "room for a runup in prices towards the end of the year"
  • SNC-Lavalin-China agreement could expand market for CANDUs
  • Elon Musk's Hyperloop vision racing ahead of naysayers and regulators — Boring Company receives permission to tunnel 10 miles; early tests of tube successful
  • Most important auto tech of all: safety. 2017's safest cars according to IIHS and a quick look back at 1959
  • Canada Goose doubles production capacity with new Toronto plant
  • Irving Oil to build new marine terminal in NB to handle new crude from Alberta
  • Trucking industry moving toward use of EOBRs
  • NASA and Nissan to build autonomous vehicles together
  • For some car makers March was best ever
  • TransCanada confident Energy East pipeline will be built
  • More R&D, innovation not free trade deals needed to boost Canada's exports: economist
Scroll to Top