Canada-EU free trade deal in jeopardy over investor protection

The free trade deal that the Harper government has been negotiating with the European Union has been stalled, if not killed outright, by the refusal of the German government to sign it. All twenty-eight members of the EU must sign the agreement for it to take effect. The German objections to the deal as currently negotiated concern the legal protection extended to firms that invest in the EU. The “investor-state” clause allows investing companies to sue governments if they feel they are not being treated fairly by a given country’s legislation. The German government does not view this level of investor protection as necessary.

cheese-EU-Canada-free-trade-EDIweekly
EU cheese exports to Canada would more than double under the EU-Canada free trade agreement as negotiated. Germany has rejected the deal because of its investor-state clauses.

The EU is also in the midst of negotiating a free trade deal with the United States. It has been said that the Canada deal is a “test” for the US deal, and that if the Canada deal does not pass neither will the US deal. The US trade deal contains investor-state terms similar to the ones being rejected by the Germans. Under these terms, investors from Canada, and eventually from the United States, would be able to challenge policy makers and have their trade disputes resolved by independent arbitration panels, not in the courts. Trade disputes in North America are resolved  by investor state arbitration under NAFTA. The German position is that any such dispute should be resolved in the German courts.

If the multibillion-dollar free trade deal passed, virtually all duties on non-agricultural goods would be eliminated immediately, including forestry, chemical and plastic products. Most duties and tariffs would also be removed from fish and seafood and agricultural products. Canada’s beef and pork producers would be able to sell 50,000 and 81,000 tonnes respectively. European cheese makers would be able to more than double their exports to Canada. Canadian auto makers would also be able to export more cars to Europe.

Ontario has estimated that the deal would create about 30,000 jobs in the province. Various goods imported from Europe, at least in principle, would be cheaper for Canadian consumers, including foods, wines, spirits and cars. At present there are tariffs on European auto parts up to 4.5 per cent.

Did you miss this?

Other Popular Stories

  • Exports, innovation key to small business success: CIBC
  • Propane suppliers condemn Ontario government's support of natural gas expansion
  • Subsidies part of the game in global aerospace industry
  • Jobless rate down, balance of trade up as economy shows strength
  • Canada's oil industry facing labour shortage: survey
  • Is ammonia the jet fuel of the future? What other alternatives are there for commercial aviation?
  • Long-term growth in residential construction centred in GTA
  • Rapid growth of solar power a challenge for utilities
  • 200 days in lockup: Four volunteers live in simulated moon lab in preparation for future moon mission
  • GM restructuring goes forward with agressive job cuts in Ontario designed to save billions of dollars — at the same time they recruit new hires?
  • Is Clean Diesel a myth, or a yet-to-come promise?
  • Ontario's FIT program ruled illegal by World Trade Organization
  • Artificial leaf converts sunlight, water to fuel
  • Ontario's food producers missing local growth opportunities: study
  • Carbon Nanotubes — from energy storage to automotive parts, from electromagnetic shields to biomedical applications — light, stable, durable
  • TransCanada confident Energy East pipeline will be built
  • Bombardier to build more commuter trains for London transit
  • CAE USA wins $200 million contract for Army training
  • Manufacturing sales up in November, government scraps duties on imported food ingredients
  • Wind capacity reaches 82,183 megawatts in US, enough to power 24 million homes
Scroll to Top