High-level support continues for Keystone XL

What could be the most talked-about pipeline in history, the Keystone XL, is still being talked about, not built. But some of those talking about the 1,900-kilometre line are very high profile and are in favour of it. It remains to be seen whether their prominence will matter, but the head of the powerful American Petroleum Institute is not a bad ally to have presumably. Jack Gerard, president and CEO of API said that his organization was “as frustrated as anyone else is” by the delays in getting the pipeline approved, but vowed that they would not give up in their efforts to see the pipeline built. He called it a “no-brainer” that would boost domestic energy and jobs in the US.

Gerard made the comments to an audience of oil and gas producers, policy analysts, lobbyists and reporters, while presenting the API’s annual State of American Energy report. The project is to be paid for by the private sector, “without a dime of taxpayer money,” he noted, and the president could move it forward with a simple “yes.”

TransCanada-KeystoneXL-pipeline-Alberta-Texas-Gulf-Coast-President-Obama-Harper-EDIWeekly

Another high-profile American, President Obama’s former national security advisor Tom Donilon, said yesterday that he would recommend the approval of the pipeline if asked. Donilon said that having more crude available to the US would enhance its energy security, giving the country greater leverage and ability to “hedge” against potential supply disruptions elsewhere. The Keystone XL pipeline would bring approximately 830,000 barrels of oil per day from Alberta to the US Gulf Coast.

In this country, the prime minister said he is still confident the project, with a price tag of $5.4 billion, will go ahead eventually. He noted, speaking in Vancouver, that there is widespread support for the pipeline “on both sides of the aisle, in both political parties, in both houses, and throughout the American economy and public.” President Obama, he said, did not say no, but “punted” on the question, meaning, according to Harper, that the president is still undecided.

It has been five years since TransCanada Corp. first applied to build the pipeline. The project has two sections, one of which is entirely within the US and does not, therefore, require presidential approval. That southern portion, costing $2.3 billion, runs from Oklahoma to Texas and is in the process of starting up. It will carry 700,000 barrels of oil a day.

As for the contentious northern portion of the pipeline, the head of TransCanada, Russ Girling is also optimistic, saying that he expects approval in the first quarter of this year.

Did you miss this?

Other Popular Stories

  • New wind farm approved near Lake Huron shore
  • Breakthrough vehicles that dare to change the auto industry: 1300 hp EVs and 300 km ranges
  • Quebec aerospace industry in good shape despite setbacks
  • Bombardier CSeries finally flies the skies of Paris
  • India interested in oil and gas as well as uranium from Canada
  • Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid, first electric minivan, rolls out in Windsor
  • Wood proponents pushing higher with hybrid construction
  • Compact reactor could make fusion dream a reality
  • Oil producers agree to cut output to boost prices as global supply remains higher than demand
  • Researchers claim improved performance from lithium-air battery
  • Progress made on Detroit River cleanup: fish no longer smells
  • GO Transit may deploy hydrogen-power rather than electric; consults with Canadian fuel cell technology company that worked on world's first hydrogen-powered train
  • Expansion of wine and beer sales in Ontario grocery stores condemned by OPSEU
  • Gas producers argue for use of LNG to power northern communities
  • Membraneless flow battery shows great promise for cheaper energy storage
  • With $390 billion in trade at stake, Premier Ford met with manufacturing trade partners; says steel and aluminum tariffs hurt the U.S. more than Canada
  • Toronto company seeking to market energy storage system
  • SPACE 1971 vs today: looking back on the anniversary of Apollo 14's landing on the moon; with new landings planned, how much have we advanced?
  • Jobs that are at risk of automation — and jobs that are not
  • Strength to build on, but Canada still lags in industrial R&D
Scroll to Top