High-level support continues for Keystone XL

What could be the most talked-about pipeline in history, the Keystone XL, is still being talked about, not built. But some of those talking about the 1,900-kilometre line are very high profile and are in favour of it. It remains to be seen whether their prominence will matter, but the head of the powerful American Petroleum Institute is not a bad ally to have presumably. Jack Gerard, president and CEO of API said that his organization was “as frustrated as anyone else is” by the delays in getting the pipeline approved, but vowed that they would not give up in their efforts to see the pipeline built. He called it a “no-brainer” that would boost domestic energy and jobs in the US.

Gerard made the comments to an audience of oil and gas producers, policy analysts, lobbyists and reporters, while presenting the API’s annual State of American Energy report. The project is to be paid for by the private sector, “without a dime of taxpayer money,” he noted, and the president could move it forward with a simple “yes.”

TransCanada-KeystoneXL-pipeline-Alberta-Texas-Gulf-Coast-President-Obama-Harper-EDIWeekly

Another high-profile American, President Obama’s former national security advisor Tom Donilon, said yesterday that he would recommend the approval of the pipeline if asked. Donilon said that having more crude available to the US would enhance its energy security, giving the country greater leverage and ability to “hedge” against potential supply disruptions elsewhere. The Keystone XL pipeline would bring approximately 830,000 barrels of oil per day from Alberta to the US Gulf Coast.

In this country, the prime minister said he is still confident the project, with a price tag of $5.4 billion, will go ahead eventually. He noted, speaking in Vancouver, that there is widespread support for the pipeline “on both sides of the aisle, in both political parties, in both houses, and throughout the American economy and public.” President Obama, he said, did not say no, but “punted” on the question, meaning, according to Harper, that the president is still undecided.

It has been five years since TransCanada Corp. first applied to build the pipeline. The project has two sections, one of which is entirely within the US and does not, therefore, require presidential approval. That southern portion, costing $2.3 billion, runs from Oklahoma to Texas and is in the process of starting up. It will carry 700,000 barrels of oil a day.

As for the contentious northern portion of the pipeline, the head of TransCanada, Russ Girling is also optimistic, saying that he expects approval in the first quarter of this year.

Did you miss this?

Other Popular Stories

  • Danger Doc Robinson: researchers at RMIT University find vehicle vibrations may induce sleep in drivers
  • Within 10 years, almost 50 percent of retail jobs may disappear to automation
  • Fiat Chrysler denies wrongdoing as EPA accuses it of emissions cheating
  • First new Canadian refinery in 30 years now on track for 2017
  • Twenty-kilometre tower would revolutionize space launches
  • Exports, especially oil, driving Canada's growth: EDC
  • Fracking study finds methane emissions lower than EPA estimates
  • Local Ford union rebellion over GM contract threatens pattern bargaining
  • Carbon Nanotubes — from energy storage to automotive parts, from electromagnetic shields to biomedical applications — light, stable, durable
  • WindTwin digital platform increases efficiency on wind farms and tests maintenance upgrades
  • Bombardier to build 170 high-speed rail cars for Siemens
  • Tesla is now the number one valued carmaker in America, jumping ahead of GM
  • Bombardier Transportation workers ratify contract
  • Ontario space firm wins $65 million satellite contract
  • China’s Drive for Clean Energy Results in Winter Gas Shortage
  • MRO contract of $423 million for Canada's CC-130 Hercules fleet
  • First LNG-powered ferry to begin service in Quebec
  • De Beers new diamond mine in far north among world's largest
  • Membraneless flow battery shows great promise for cheaper energy storage
  • Cement industry opposes wood construction in taller buildings
Scroll to Top