Propane suppliers condemn Ontario government’s support of natural gas expansion

The propane industry is outraged about the Ontario government’s announced $100 million Natural Gas Grant program. While admitting that natural gas is a cheaper option for consumers “at the commodity level,” Canada’s largest propane provider has reacted strongly to the Ontario government’s announcement of $100 million in support of expanded natural gas services in some rural Ontario communities. Superior Propane says the move will take “taxpayer dollars” previously set aside for rural infrastructure programs and spend them instead on natural gas pipeline expansion for the benefit of “a small few.” The cost of this infrastructure expansion, the propane supplier argues, is uneconomic. It is also unfair to the propane industry, and does little to address the rising costs of energy for those rural Ontarians who currently rely on oil and electricity for their heating.

Similar objections have been brought forward by the Canadian Propane Association (CPA), whose executive director, Andrea Labelle said in a statement that the government’s decision ignores advice it received from the Ontario Energy Board. The OEB, says Labelle, determined after an eleven-month hearing process that subsidizing natural gas delivery to rural Ontarians could not be justified. Further, the decision favours natural gas companies over propane companies, violating what the CPA calls a “basic principle of governance and economics,” that of the level playing field. Communities that wish to switch from expensive electric heat to propane should have the same grant funding as those that choose gas, the propane group argues.

In its announcement of the Natural Gas Grant program, the government said it was responding to popular demand from northern and First Nations communities. The decision has the potential to benefit many Ontarians, the government says, 75 per cent of whom already use natural gas. Gas companies that are approved to expand their services must also guarantee “long-term” rate stability for customers and must bear the risk that those customers may not in fact sign on for natural gas service.

The government says the natural gas grant program will benefit rural and First Nations communities in northern Ontario. Photo taken in Attawapiskat.

As for the question of funding and subsidies, the government insists that the OEB has always had a process in place that allows companies to recover the cost of expanding their services to new customers without passing those costs along to existing customers. Union Gas, the province’s largest gas distribution company, had proposed certain expansion projects that would have required existing customers to subsidize the new services, but that approach has apparently been denied. “The fundamentals of this decision are the same as the existing process: costs will not be subsidized by existing natural gas customers,” says a background information statement provided by the government. Union Gas issued a statement in support of the natural gas grant program.

However, Superior Propane argues that the new grant program is simply “a different and equally problematic” way for the government to use taxpayers’ money to fund natural gas expansion for the benefit of “a small group of customers.”

For comparison, the current cost for natural gas supply in Ontario is given as 11.4462 cents per cubic metre (Unbridle). The rate increase introduced on January 1, 2017 will mean an extra cost of $77 per average customer per year, based on consumption of 2,400 cubic metres per year, the supplier says. The cost of heating propane, which fluctuates considerably, is hard to pin down, ranging from lows of 40 cents per litre (1 litre = 0.001 cubic metre) to more than triple that amount.

Did you miss this?

Other Popular Stories

  • Solar researchers closing in on 50 per cent PV efficiency
  • Scientists Develop Sustainable Battery Using Tree Bark Tannins
  • $ Trillions needed to decarbonise global energy supply to meet Paris Agreement targets
  • Industrial chemicals producers report second-most profitable year
  • Pipelines, railways equally safe for transporting crude oil: report
  • NASA Tests Distant Voyager Spacecraft
  • Manufacturing sales up in December but down for the year on weak energy sector
  • NASA says human Mars landing is feasible by 2030s
  • Manufacturers and employers win with new Labour rules in Ontario; jobs did increase 17,600 in January 2019
  • FedDev money for GTA aerospace company; Bombardier cutting losses on Learjet
  • Drilling rigs growth depends more and more on LNG
  • Ontario Faces Uncertain Future with Carbon Tax
  • NASA Discovers Eighth Planet Circling Distant Star
  • California to test grid-scale power-to-gas energy storage
  • Ontario increases incentives for EV buyers
  • Little agreement on whether it works, but governments press ahead with infrastructure spending
  • Large investment in Toronto biotech company could lead to new therapies for heart patients
  • Little support in auto industry for Canada/Korea free trade deal
  • Exports, innovation key to small business success: CIBC
  • First vehicle powered by sodium-ion battery shown in UK
Scroll to Top