91% of coal-fired power plants are leaking toxic chemicals into groundwater: report

The majority of the 250 coal-fired powerplants in the US have leaked toxic chemicals into local groundwater from both coal ash waste landfills and ponds.

The data, published March 2019, found that 91% of coal-fired power plants with coal waste had elevated levels of arsenic, chromium, lithium and other contaminants in local groundwater. In many cases, the levels were above the safety thresholds set by the Environmental Protection Agency.

The data became available for review after a 2015 regulation came into effect that mandates disclosure by coal plants.

“At a time when the EPA — now being run by a coal lobbyist — is trying to roll back federal regulations on coal ash, these new data provide convincing evidence that we should be moving in the opposite direction,” wrote Abel Russ of the Environmental Integrity Project, lead author in the report. The report was also published jointly by Earthjustice.

 

Overflow from flooded coal ash pond storage in North Carolina. Photo from North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality.

 

Although the report did not prove that local drinking water supplies are polluted, the test data does verify it is in the domestic groundwater in the affected areas. However, 90 million people in the US rely on groundwater for drinking water.

Regulations dating back to 2015 require “the owner or operator of the facility to initiate measures to clean up the contamination,” said John Konkus, spokesperson for the EPA. [1] The rules also stipulate how coal ash should be stored. The regulations were reactionary, after two significant spills in North Carolina and Tennessee, which contaminated streams, rivers and waterways and even damaged houses.

NOTES
[1] Reported in the Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/report-finds-widespread-contamination-at-nations-coal-ash-sites/2019/03/03/

Did you miss this?

Other Popular Stories

  • TransCanada announces $900 million pipeline expansion
  • Natural resources, manufacturing show stronger than expected growth in February
  • First wood frame mid-rise construction in Toronto will be condos
  • No fracking for now in Nova Scotia
  • Ontario increases incentives for EV buyers
  • Automation, robotics to have profound effect on industry in coming years
  • Slight drop in April manufacturing sales due to petroleum, aerospace
  • Economy showed mix of strength (exports), weakness (investment) in Q3
  • Airline debacle highlights need for businesses to be tech smart
  • Tesla Model S earns near-perfect score from Consumer Reports
  • Company opens new landing gear plant for "most important contract" ever
  • Armoured vehicles an important niche in Ontario's auto industry
  • Top seven pieces of exciting new tech that will soon become mainstream
  • Corporate profits up 8.8 per cent over last year: Statistics Canada
  • Renault's autonomous float hover car by Yunchen Chai may be the automobile of the future — winner of a design competition from Renault
  • LNG Canada moves ahead with BC project as China and Russia sign huge gas deal
  • North American oil and gas industry has trouble finding workers
  • Canada's energy sector "at a crossroads," risks falling behind
  • SPACE 1971 vs today: looking back on the anniversary of Apollo 14's landing on the moon; with new landings planned, how much have we advanced?
  • Keystone XL clears another hurdle but fight not over
Scroll to Top